Skip to content
Nova Gaming Studio

Tetris Didn't Win at This Gaming Ceremony — An Additional Classification May Address This Issue

Each time a prominent honors show draws close, you'll find a demand for introducing additional classifications to recognize unsung work and fill the passions of enthusiasts who have specialized interests.

Another commentator previously argued advocating for terror-themed awards. It would be amazing. So would tabletop games, which is a dedicated supporter's campaign. However, I must insist when I prioritize since similar to single-minded supporters, there's a strong justification supporting my request is the most urgent above others. The demand is this: There should be a category for puzzle games.

Categorizing Game Types

Organizing artistic expressions isn't exact; it’s very subjective, and it will always start arguments resulting in unclear classifications. There’s a reason cinema institutions avoid this approach. However, it represents a necessary evil for the industry of video games, showing incredible range they hardly constitute as a single art form.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of achievement in video games to receive acknowledgment, and for games of all stripes to compete fairly, classification by type becomes crucial.

Current Gaming Award Categories

Leading game ceremonies presently include classifications covering Action, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these six categories effectively encompass many game types, allowing placement for most games within them.

Different situation exists for logic-based experiences. There’s simply nowhere to put them. Consider three of this year’s best games, all very different: building puzzles from a specific release, intense tile-matching from another release, thought-provoking social scenarios in another game. Where could they possibly go among existing types? Simply put, no category fits.

Acknowledgment Issues

Many instances occur of brilliant puzzle games released every year without proper recognition at major award shows, except when they manage to fit classification types such as Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive Indie races.

  • A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated for anything that year
  • Another creative title received no nominations during that ceremony
  • Well-received sorting experience got ignored that year
  • Limited numbers of brain-teasers scraped into small studio or handheld classifications

Significance of Puzzle Games

These are often small games, however the design in brain-teasers holds tremendous importance. Iconic mobile puzzle games rank among most popular titles in the world continuing this trend for over a decade.

The iconic tile-matching title competes with well-known building titles competing to become best-selling game of all time; it additionally competes as greatest title ever. Puzzle games are foundational for gaming as medium, and engaging across multiple categories.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter this problem. It would be easy to populate a field of five engaging, different, qualified experiences annually without trouble — actually, with challenge, since numerous excellent so many good games out.

To emphasize again, these include experiences lacking appropriate categories during prominent ceremonies. Logic title developers operate at the demanding boundary game development, creating some of most fundamental forms of gaming itself. Comparable to cinema stunt performers, they warrant appreciation. We shouldn't delay generations.

About the author

Linda Vazquez

Elara Vance is a seasoned gaming journalist and industry analyst with over a decade of experience covering video games and tech trends.

Nova Gaming Studio

Type to search articles.